EQIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 24.57%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $960.54, signalling upside risk potential of 26.57%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.89 which suggests that it could grow by 17.01%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Equinix has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.275% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.693%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $674.5M. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.89x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 42.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.28x versus 7.50x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 1%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $960.54, signalling upside risk potential of 26.57%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $115.30 which suggests that it could grow by 16.51%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Iron Mountain, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Iron Mountain.

Equinix has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.275% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.372%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than Iron Mountain's net income of $16M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.89x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 241.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.28x versus 4.67x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 27.45%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $960.54, signalling upside risk potential of 26.57%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $129.20 which suggests that it could grow by 3.1%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Equinix has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.275% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.358%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $505.4M. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.89x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 30.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.28x versus 5.81x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 15.42% compared to Equinix's net margin of 9.62%. Equinix's return on equity of 7.05% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 2.32%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $960.54, signalling upside risk potential of 26.57%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $49.63 which suggests that it could grow by 22.02%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than PotlatchDeltic, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than PotlatchDeltic.

Equinix has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.275% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.813%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Equinix's net income of $343M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $25.8M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.89x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 66.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.28x versus 2.92x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.